
Term Sheet Red Flags: What Founders Miss in Legalese
Jun 20
3 min read
0
0
The devil isn’t in the details. It’s in the definitions.
A founder once told me after signing a term sheet:
“We were so relieved to get funding, we didn’t notice we gave up control without giving up equity.”
It happens more often than you think.

Because term sheets sound friendly—until they’re not.
You’ll hear:
“These are just standard clauses.” Or: “We’ll fix that in the SHA later.”
But here’s the truth: what you miss in your term sheet today can define your company’s tomorrow.
Let’s break down what most founders overlook—and how to catch it before you commit.
Step 1: The “Control Without Majority” Trick
You may still own 70% of the company—but lose the right to steer it.
Red flags:
Investor veto rights on hiring, budgets, or fundraising
Board seat mandates with majority voting power
Founder vesting reset clauses
What to ask:
“Do any of these clauses give them power without proportional ownership?”
Control is more often given away by clauses than by cap tables.
Step 2: The Liquidation Preference Illusion
“2x non-participating preference” might sound harmless.
Here’s what it means:
Investor gets 2x their money back first, before you get anything
If the company exits at ₹20 crore and they invested ₹5 crore—they take ₹10 crore off the top
Add in participating preferences, and they take more—even after their 2x.
Fix it:
Push for 1x non-participating
Negotiate removal of double-dip clauses
Understand what happens in mediocre exits, not just unicorn dreams
You’re not negotiating for success. You’re protecting for any outcome.
Step 3: The Anti-Dilution Clause Time Bomb
Standard anti-dilution is okay. But full ratchet? Dangerous.
In a down round:
Investors get their price adjusted fully to match the new round
Your equity gets crushed to make up for the difference
Watch for:
Full-ratchet anti-dilution
No cap on future dilution protections
Lack of carve-outs for ESOP pool increases
Your future investors may invest in you.
But your past paperwork could scare them off.
Step 4: The ESOP Pool Trap
Term sheets often require an ESOP top-up pre-money.
If you don’t negotiate it, the dilution comes from your share—not theirs.
Example:
Raise ₹10 crore at ₹40 crore pre-money
Add 10% ESOP pool pre-money
Your effective valuation drops to ₹36 crore—and your dilution just increased
What to do:
Push for post-money pool creation
If pre-money is non-negotiable, adjust valuation accordingly
Protect your ownership quietly—through structure, not struggle.
Step 5: The Exit Clause You Never Read
Some term sheets bury drag-along rights deep inside.
This means:
If a majority investor wants to sell, you must sell your stake too
You lose the option to hold out for a better exit or different partner
Ask for:
Drag-along thresholds (not one investor can trigger it alone)
Exit veto rights on minimum valuation
Reasonable notice and consent periods
Your dream exit shouldn't become someone else’s quick liquidation.
TL;DR – Too Long; Didn’t Read
Term sheets aren’t “non-binding” in spirit—only in enforcement.
Watch out for veto rights, liquidation preferences, full ratchets, and ESOP pool traps.
Protect not just valuation—but control, dilution, and future flexibility.
Get a startup lawyer. Always. Legalese isn’t a founder skillset—it’s a survival tool.
Getting a term sheet isn’t the win.
Signing the right one is.
Because when things go wrong (or even right), your term sheet becomes your rulebook.
And trust me—what’s written will outweigh what was “understood.”