Explore Kompass IQ Insights

“I know it isn’t working. But we have already put so much into it.” A client said this to me recently while we were discussing a decision that had gone wrong. A substantial amount of money had already been committed, but the larger investment was the time, energy and attention spent trying to make it work.

A few years ago, I was speaking to the head of a large business family. We were discussing wealth, the next generation and what they wanted their money to do for them. At one point, he said something that sounded almost contradictory: “I know we have enough money. But I also feel we should spend more.”

Refusing to when the facts have changed is. “Why are you asking one client to stay invested while asking another to churn his portfolio?” That question came from a wealth manager interning with us during one of our portfolio review meetings. Earlier that morning, we had advised one client to do absolutely nothing. His portfolio was progressing as expected. The funds continued to justify our original thesis, so our advice was simple. Stay invested. Time is still your bigges

Because the financial advice that protected one generation can quietly limit the next. A client recently asked us, “What are the financial rules you live by?” He answered without pausing. Never take a loan unless you have to. Always buy property when you can. Never sell equity in a falling market. Keep two years’ expenses in cash. A younger client shared something quite different. “I follow my dad’s advice, but half of it doesn’t seem to apply to me anymore. I just don’t

Recently, I met two young couples within a few weeks of each other. The first couple had been married for over seven years. They had a young son, another child on the way, successful careers and a sizeable investment portfolio. Their finances were well organised and spread across multiple assets. Yet they appeared stressed and exhausted. The second couple had been married for three years. Both were earning well and had begun building their financial lives together. They had

In one of our meetings, a client recently asked: "The rupee keeps falling. Should investors be worried?" Every time the rupee weakens, headlines become more pessimistic, social media fills with predictions of economic trouble, and many investors assume a falling currency automatically signals a weakening nation. But currencies are often more complicated than they appear. Markets frequently confuse movement with meaning.

Recent geopolitical tensions have quietly brought it back into focus. And it’s not market risk. It’s not asset allocation. It’s loneliness. The quiet kind.- The kind where an investor is constantly reading research, tracking charts, following market experts, and searching for the next multibagger.

I’ve sat across the table from dozens of clients with beautifully detailed retirement spreadsheets. Cash flows mapped till age 95. Contingency buffers tucked into every category. Graphs that forecast income, growth, inflation, and taxes.

Over the years, I’ve met many couples where one partner handles the finances, and the other just nods politely. It starts out simple. One of them has more interest or experience, so they take charge. The SIPs are set, the insurance is handled, and the retirement corpus is on track.

We spend most of our lives introducing ourselves by what we do. “I head the dealing desk at…” “I work in wealth advisory…” “I’m part of the markets team…” Then, one day, you stop. Not suddenly but eventually, the job ends, the meetings fade, and the inbox slows down.

There’s a quiet shift that happens in every investor’s life. It’s not triggered by age. It’s triggered by change. You stop focusing on how much you can earn and start asking how long what you’ve earned will last. Salaries slow down. EMI goals are behind you. The question in your head changes from “How do I grow my capital?” to “How do I make it last?”

Turning 50 does something to your perspective. For years, I’ve obsessed over market moves, built portfolios, and helped people grow wealth. But lately, a more personal question has taken center stage: how do you start spending the wealth you’ve worked so hard to build - without second-guessing every rupee?

Most dreams don’t come with a vesting schedule. But this one did. You joined a company when it was small. Took a bet. Stayed through the chaos. And now your ESOPs have matured.

What you delay today could cost you clarity, capital, and control tomorrow. A founder once told me: “I’ve been meaning to track monthly expenses and reconcile accounts... for the past 9 months.” Another said: “I know I should set up a salary structure, but I keep postponing it—other things feel more urgent.” This is procrastination in business finances—not due to incompetence, but due to overwhelm, discomfort, or avoidance.

The first number you hear shouldn’t set the price you pay. A client once told me: “The vendor quoted ₹80,000 for the software. I negotiated down to ₹68,000 and felt good—until I realized a competitor paid ₹50,000.” Another shared: “Once the supplier mentioned a 45-day delivery window, I stopped questioning it—even though we needed it in 30.” This is anchoring bias in action—a mental shortcut that quietly affects how you perceive value and negotiate.

Same deal. Different wording. Entirely different decision. A founder once told me: “I passed on a deal that felt too risky. Later, I saw someone describe it as ‘a 90% chance of success with 10% volatility’—and suddenly it felt doable.” Another shared: “When the vendor said ‘You’ll lose 15% margin,’ I backed out. If they’d said ‘You’ll still keep 85%,’ I might’ve taken it.” This isn’t about math.

You’re not overspending because you're reckless—you're just proving yourself right. A founder once said: “We tried influencer marketing, and it didn’t work. But I kept pouring money into it for 6 more months—because I wanted it to work.” Another purchased an expensive CRM software after one positive review, then ignored team complaints for over a year.

Sometimes, the worst loss is the one you keep trying to avoid. A business owner once admitted: “We kept spending on a product that never took off. We’d already sunk so much into development—we couldn’t bear to shut it down.” Another kept stocking a slow-moving product line for two extra years, saying: “We thought demand might bounce back. It didn’t. And it blocked our cash flow.” This isn’t bad strategy or poor judgment.

Less complexity doesn’t mean less friction—especially when habits and emotions are involved. A client once said: “I set a simple rule: spend only ₹5,000 a month on dining out. But by the 12th, I’d overshot it without realising.” Another shared: “We created a two-line budget—essentials and non-essentials. Somehow, it never matched what we actually spent.” At first glance, a simple budget seems like the easiest way to manage money. Fewer categories. Less data entry. Easy t

One great month doesn’t make a trend. One bad quarter doesn’t mean the model is broken. A business owner once said: “We had one blockbuster campaign. I assumed that would be our new normal—so I ramped up hiring. Within two months, cash flow was tight again.” Another admitted: “A client defaulted. It shook my confidence so much I paused all growth plans—even though the pipeline was solid.”