Explore Kompass IQ Insights

I’ve sat across the table from dozens of clients with beautifully detailed retirement spreadsheets. Cash flows mapped till age 95. Contingency buffers tucked into every category. Graphs that forecast income, growth, inflation, and taxes.

Over the years, I’ve met many couples where one partner handles the finances, and the other just nods politely. It starts out simple. One of them has more interest or experience, so they take charge. The SIPs are set, the insurance is handled, and the retirement corpus is on track.

We spend most of our lives introducing ourselves by what we do. “I head the dealing desk at…” “I work in wealth advisory…” “I’m part of the markets team…” Then, one day, you stop. Not suddenly but eventually, the job ends, the meetings fade, and the inbox slows down.

There’s a quiet shift that happens in every investor’s life. It’s not triggered by age. It’s triggered by change. You stop focusing on how much you can earn and start asking how long what you’ve earned will last. Salaries slow down. EMI goals are behind you. The question in your head changes from “How do I grow my capital?” to “How do I make it last?”

Turning 50 does something to your perspective. For years, I’ve obsessed over market moves, built portfolios, and helped people grow wealth. But lately, a more personal question has taken center stage: how do you start spending the wealth you’ve worked so hard to build - without second-guessing every rupee?

Most dreams don’t come with a vesting schedule. But this one did. You joined a company when it was small. Took a bet. Stayed through the chaos. And now your ESOPs have matured.

What you delay today could cost you clarity, capital, and control tomorrow. A founder once told me: “I’ve been meaning to track monthly expenses and reconcile accounts... for the past 9 months.” Another said: “I know I should set up a salary structure, but I keep postponing it—other things feel more urgent.” This is procrastination in business finances—not due to incompetence, but due to overwhelm, discomfort, or avoidance.

The first number you hear shouldn’t set the price you pay. A client once told me: “The vendor quoted ₹80,000 for the software. I negotiated down to ₹68,000 and felt good—until I realized a competitor paid ₹50,000.” Another shared: “Once the supplier mentioned a 45-day delivery window, I stopped questioning it—even though we needed it in 30.” This is anchoring bias in action—a mental shortcut that quietly affects how you perceive value and negotiate.

Same deal. Different wording. Entirely different decision. A founder once told me: “I passed on a deal that felt too risky. Later, I saw someone describe it as ‘a 90% chance of success with 10% volatility’—and suddenly it felt doable.” Another shared: “When the vendor said ‘You’ll lose 15% margin,’ I backed out. If they’d said ‘You’ll still keep 85%,’ I might’ve taken it.” This isn’t about math.

You’re not overspending because you're reckless—you're just proving yourself right. A founder once said: “We tried influencer marketing, and it didn’t work. But I kept pouring money into it for 6 more months—because I wanted it to work.” Another purchased an expensive CRM software after one positive review, then ignored team complaints for over a year.

Sometimes, the worst loss is the one you keep trying to avoid. A business owner once admitted: “We kept spending on a product that never took off. We’d already sunk so much into development—we couldn’t bear to shut it down.” Another kept stocking a slow-moving product line for two extra years, saying: “We thought demand might bounce back. It didn’t. And it blocked our cash flow.” This isn’t bad strategy or poor judgment.

Less complexity doesn’t mean less friction—especially when habits and emotions are involved. A client once said: “I set a simple rule: spend only ₹5,000 a month on dining out. But by the 12th, I’d overshot it without realising.” Another shared: “We created a two-line budget—essentials and non-essentials. Somehow, it never matched what we actually spent.” At first glance, a simple budget seems like the easiest way to manage money. Fewer categories. Less data entry. Easy t

One great month doesn’t make a trend. One bad quarter doesn’t mean the model is broken. A business owner once said: “We had one blockbuster campaign. I assumed that would be our new normal—so I ramped up hiring. Within two months, cash flow was tight again.” Another admitted: “A client defaulted. It shook my confidence so much I paused all growth plans—even though the pipeline was solid.”

Building something makes you proud. Selling it effectively means seeing it clearly. A founder once said: “We priced our solution 30% higher than competitors because we knew it was better. But customers didn’t see it that way.” Another shared: “I kept saying no to feedback. I thought, ‘they just don’t understand the product.’ But after six months, sales hadn’t moved.” This is the endowment effect at work—a behavioural bias where we overvalue what we own or create, simply

Hope is not a model. Confidence is not a forecast. A founder once said: “I was sure our product would break even in six months. It took 18—and we almost ran out of cash.” Another shared: “We hired based on expected growth, not actual revenue. Looking back, we were just too confident in our projections.” This isn’t about incompetence.

Same money. Different treatment. Predictable bias. A business owner once admitted: “I’ve delayed paying my own salary for three months, but I clear vendor invoices on time—even when cash is tight.” Another said: “When our revenue dipped, I cut team incentives but continued office renovations. It felt easier to control internal cost than renegotiate with vendors.”

Money already spent should inform your history—not your next move. A founder once said: “We’ve already spent ₹40 lakhs setting up the second outlet. We have to continue—even if the numbers don’t work—otherwise it’s a waste.” Another admitted: “We invested 18 months into a new vertical. It’s draining our team and cash—but I just can’t walk away.” This is the sunk cost fallacy in action.

A discount can drive sales or damage perception. The difference lies in why and how you offer it. A retail business owner once said: “Every time we run a discount, footfall increases—but profit drops. We’re busier, not better off.” Another shared: “Customers now wait for the offer window. We’ve trained them to buy only when we’re on sale.” This isn’t a pricing problem—it’s a psychology problem.

You’re not making poor financial decisions because you’re careless—sometimes, you’re just tired. A café owner once shared: “By 6 p.m., I can decide what’s on tomorrow’s menu, but not whether to invest in that new delivery platform.”

You’re not just managing money—you’re managing how you think about money. A business owner once told me: “I don’t invest because I’m always worried something will go wrong. I’d rather keep cash in the account—even if it earns nothing.” Another said: “We reinvest profits every year without fear. Some bets work, some don’t—but we keep building.” Two similar businesses.